Ophthalmology in China

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The effect of peripheral anterior synechia extent on intraocular pressure control of laser peripheral iridoplasty in acute primary angle-closure glaucoma

LI Si-zhen1, LIANG Yuan-bo2, WANG Ning-li3, SUN Xia3, FAN Su-jie4 , SUN Lan-ping4, LIU Wen-ru4, SUCIJANTI3.   

  1. 1. Nanjing Tongren Hospital, Nanjing 210006, China; 2. The Affiliated Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China; 3. Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University; Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology & Visual Science. Beijing 100005, China; 4. Handan Eye Hospital, Handan 056005, China.
  • Received:2018-02-11 Online:2019-01-25 Published:2019-01-29
  • Contact: WANG Ning-li, Email: wningli@vip.163.com

Abstract:

 Objective  To evaluate the effects of peripheral anterior synechia (PAS) on acute attack stage of acute primary angle-closure glaucoma (APACG) cases who received argon laser peripheral iridoplasty (LPIP). Design prospective comparative case series. Participants 116 patients (116 eyes) with acute stage of primary angle-closure glaucoma in Handan Eye Hospital. Methods 84 eyes received LPIP treatment (LPIP group) and 32 eyes received medical treatment (medical group). Intraocular pressure ( IOP) at 1, 2 and 6 hours (IOP1 h, IOP2 h, and IOP6 h) were measured after treatment. IOP, fundus examination, gonioscopy, endocellium cell count (ECC) was measured after the IOPs were controlled. Main outcome Measures IOP and PAS extent. Results Strong correlation was found between PAS and attack duration (AD) in LPIP group and medical group (r=0.579, 0.288; P<0.05).  Strong correlation was found between PAS and IOP2 h, IOP6 h in LPIP group (r=0.296, 0.334; P<0.05). PAS extent in AD≤24 h group (2.3±2.9 clocks) was smaller than AD>24 h group (6.2±4.0 clocks) ( P<0.001). There was no difference in IOP1 h, IOP2 h and IOP6 h between PAS≤6 clocks group and PAS>6 clocks group in APACG received medical treatment. IOP1 h (28.4±15.1), IOP2 h (22.0±13.1) and IOP6 h (17.9±8.52) in PAS≤6 clocks group were lower than those (35.5±15.5, 29.6±11.4, 24.9±10.4, P=0.066, 0.020, 0.003) in PAS>6 clocks group.  Conclusions  APACG with PAS≤6 clocks has better IOP control than those with PAS >6 clocks in LPIP. (Ophthalmol CHN, 2019, 28: 23-28)